Subject	one thing:
Posted by	Marshall on December 07, 2002 at 10:47 AM
	This message has been viewed 56 times.
In Reply To	Just got back from the track this evening. New 1/4mi times> posted by AshsZ (The Rebuild King) on December 07, 2002 at 02:13 AM
Message	Well, admittedly it is a very short amount of time, (~10ms) but it is in tune with the speed of the engine so it is usable energy. Detonation is the burning of the fuel that occurs over a very short period of time in comparison to 'normal burning'. Instead of the pressures increasing steadily as the piston moves its motion, detonation is pretty much an all at once BANG! It occurs 100 times quicker, in the nanosecond time measure. Wouldn't 100 times faster than 10 milliseconds be 100 microseconds? That should still be 100,000 times slower than a nanosecond. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong (I don't like playing with so many zeros.)
Follow Ups	Just got back from the track this evening. New 1/4mi times> - AshsZ (The Rebuild King) 02:13:37 12/07/02 Bookmarked man! Very awesome. Thanx for the post! (n/m) - SoSideways 03:01:20 12/07/02 Pfff.. that was only 2,000 words :) nice run at the track - Kez43 03:57:31 12/07/02 1937 (n/m) - Snoguitar 03:03:09 12/07/02 when was the last time you saw the sun? (n/m) - HalfnHalf702[HJC] 12:07:56 12/07/02 bah, I was rounding up :) (n/m) - Kez43 13:27:26 12/07/02 well you have thoroughly explained the theory of - Luke@tirerack 07:05:18 12/07/02 they don't suck... air is forced in by atmoshperic pressure - 3 double-0 ZX(Va Bch) 09:27:57 12/07/02 Skywalker is correct, piston stroke SUCKS then compresses. (n/m) - quikz 09:56:16 12/07/02 Physics majors are taught that there is no suck, it's push. (n/m) - Funky (NWZ) 10:02:36 12/07/02 No suck, that sux (n/m) - ZPilot(Miami) 10:11:39 12/07/02 Suck, squish, bang, blow to be precise. But, - Miles (San Antonio, TX) 10:42:22 12/07/02 I "just say no" to fat chicks. (n/m) - Marshall 11:04:53 12/07/02 werd. air is pushed in because of the void created - 3 double-0 ZX(Va Bch) 15:28:45 12/07/02 neat. (n/m) - quikz 18:02:03 12/07/02 then where does the vaccum come from at idle and cruising? (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 10:48:21 12/07/02 it wouldn't if something wasn't creating a partial vacuum - Marshall 10:51:47 12/07/02 Yep, you reach the point of diminishing returns quickly - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 08:30:40 12/07/02 nice write up, very interesting!! come tune my car please (n/m) - serge968 08:52:45 12/07/02 testing for det, under full load like that isn't smart.... - Halo Z 09:14:58 12/07/02 Didn't read the whole thing... - sparkie 09:17:04 12/07/02 Interesting post,long but interesting! n/m - lewoolf2 09:37:59 12/07/02 Props. Ever think of relocating the battery to the hatch? - U ZCREAM (Vice City) 10:03:03 12/07/02 Ever see Kyle Pucket's car back in the day? ,,,,lol (n/m) - ZBlacktt 10:30:52 12/07/02 Wasn't that just a fuel cell? - U ZCREAM (Vice City) 11:41:58 12/07/02 Rides section show's it, it was a Daily driver >> - ZBlacktt 11:52:30 12/07/02 OK,ok, Your doing alot of sh*t to get a high 12/ low 13,,lol - ZBlacktt 10:26:08 12/07/02 I thought 15 degrees timing change was something, but - Miles (San Antonio, TX) 10:40:23 12/07/02 one thing: - Marshall 10:47:01 12/07/02 Ash, You are my hero. Keep up the good work! (n/m) - SniPer SR71 (Dallas) 12:00:58 12/07/02 I thought Seedy was having troubles hooking. Guess he can't - robbase9 14:05:32 12/07/02 Ash..i have a request. - Ballistic 17:45:58 12/07/02 thought i was just in for a timeslip, now my heads spinning (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 18:18:39 12/07/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.